<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for robert hempsall - information designer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:48:34 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The difference between answering questions and getting answers by Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/the-difference-between-answering-questions-and-getting-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=750#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>I think emotional usability is a pretty good term, and I guess it&#039;s the that&#039;s actually hard to put into practice when researching a piece of design, or language for that matter. I would think it&#039;s very hard to create artificial stress on research subjects because they know the implications of any wrong decisions don&#039;t actually matter to them. In fact, they&#039;re probably aware that any mistakes are good data for the researchers. And purely from a PR point of view I&#039;m not sure many clients would want to create unnecessary stress on potential or existing customers.

Clearly your experience about at Frankfurt airport is a failure of information design (perhaps surprising as airports are generally held as being the crown jewels of wayfinding work). In fact, any situation like this where someone feels a need to seek human reassurance can be seen as a failure of information design. However, in many cases I&#039;d suggest there&#039;s a failure of belief too. As you said on a tweet &#039;we don&#039;t want to misunderstand&#039;. If the likes of me do our job as well as we can, then there should never be any misunderstanding, but we&#039;ll have to go a long way to beat the element of doubt that exists in a person&#039;s mind, an element of doubt that increases exponentially with the importance of their decision - and of course their mental state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think emotional usability is a pretty good term, and I guess it&#8217;s the that&#8217;s actually hard to put into practice when researching a piece of design, or language for that matter. I would think it&#8217;s very hard to create artificial stress on research subjects because they know the implications of any wrong decisions don&#8217;t actually matter to them. In fact, they&#8217;re probably aware that any mistakes are good data for the researchers. And purely from a PR point of view I&#8217;m not sure many clients would want to create unnecessary stress on potential or existing customers.</p>
<p>Clearly your experience about at Frankfurt airport is a failure of information design (perhaps surprising as airports are generally held as being the crown jewels of wayfinding work). In fact, any situation like this where someone feels a need to seek human reassurance can be seen as a failure of information design. However, in many cases I&#8217;d suggest there&#8217;s a failure of belief too. As you said on a tweet &#8216;we don&#8217;t want to misunderstand&#8217;. If the likes of me do our job as well as we can, then there should never be any misunderstanding, but we&#8217;ll have to go a long way to beat the element of doubt that exists in a person&#8217;s mind, an element of doubt that increases exponentially with the importance of their decision &#8211; and of course their mental state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The difference between answering questions and getting answers by Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/the-difference-between-answering-questions-and-getting-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=750#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re starting to touch on a topic that has festered, uh, simmered at the back of my mind for ages. I need to write a blog post about it myself. I&#039;m talking about a concept I call &quot;emotional usability&quot;, although, as far as I can see, that term is already in use in a different way. I am talking about the state of person using a website or a document. They are stressed or emotional - I was very distraught and emotional when hunting for a nursing home. The need was urgent and the geographic situation was awkward. I was negative about the hunt before I started. Train (and plane) passengers are also stressed. Think Frankfurt airport, for example! I was in transit there once with very little time to spare. The color scheme and layout was lovely. There was no monitor in sight that could tell me where my next plane was parked. Frankly (ha, ha), I was furious at the thoughtlessness and inconvenience. Not that I have anger issues, but I knew someone had designed the place with some huge committee and they had forgotten ME! The passive info, like signage, was useless. Ground crew, the active info so to speak, was sparse. When I realized my bind, I mentally blocked out all signs and searched for a human being employed by the airport. Luckily, the first one I met was intelligent, knowing, and unfazed by a stressed person in transit.

Is this &quot;emotional usability&quot; or what? Psychic usability? Human usability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re starting to touch on a topic that has festered, uh, simmered at the back of my mind for ages. I need to write a blog post about it myself. I&#8217;m talking about a concept I call &#8220;emotional usability&#8221;, although, as far as I can see, that term is already in use in a different way. I am talking about the state of person using a website or a document. They are stressed or emotional &#8211; I was very distraught and emotional when hunting for a nursing home. The need was urgent and the geographic situation was awkward. I was negative about the hunt before I started. Train (and plane) passengers are also stressed. Think Frankfurt airport, for example! I was in transit there once with very little time to spare. The color scheme and layout was lovely. There was no monitor in sight that could tell me where my next plane was parked. Frankly (ha, ha), I was furious at the thoughtlessness and inconvenience. Not that I have anger issues, but I knew someone had designed the place with some huge committee and they had forgotten ME! The passive info, like signage, was useless. Ground crew, the active info so to speak, was sparse. When I realized my bind, I mentally blocked out all signs and searched for a human being employed by the airport. Luckily, the first one I met was intelligent, knowing, and unfazed by a stressed person in transit.</p>
<p>Is this &#8220;emotional usability&#8221; or what? Psychic usability? Human usability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The difference between answering questions and getting answers by Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/the-difference-between-answering-questions-and-getting-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1573</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=750#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Karen. Far more insightful than the post itself.

I saw something recently about an experiment in a train station where exit signs were removed and a group of stooges (for want of a better word) were placed among the genuine passengers. These stooges then made their way to the exit, and lo and behold, the majority of genuine passengers chose to follow them, assuming they knew the way. Coupled with the experiences you&#039;ve described it does become clear that we&#039;d still rather trust another human who seems confident in what they&#039;re telling us.

Perhaps it&#039;s the confidence in the way an answer is given that inspires belief in the answer itself, and this is where written information falls down. If it fills the reader with even the slightest doubt, it is immediately less successful than getting the same information from another person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Karen. Far more insightful than the post itself.</p>
<p>I saw something recently about an experiment in a train station where exit signs were removed and a group of stooges (for want of a better word) were placed among the genuine passengers. These stooges then made their way to the exit, and lo and behold, the majority of genuine passengers chose to follow them, assuming they knew the way. Coupled with the experiences you&#8217;ve described it does become clear that we&#8217;d still rather trust another human who seems confident in what they&#8217;re telling us.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s the confidence in the way an answer is given that inspires belief in the answer itself, and this is where written information falls down. If it fills the reader with even the slightest doubt, it is immediately less successful than getting the same information from another person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The difference between answering questions and getting answers by Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/the-difference-between-answering-questions-and-getting-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=750#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>Very interesting! When I&#039;ve worked at conferences as a volunteer, I&#039;ve noticed how attendees will ask a person for information - while both are standing right next to a sign containing that info (like location of sessions or lunch)! That lesson sits at the back of my mind as a reminder of the importance of the real-life aspect of our work.

When I researched nursing homes for my late mother, I did so long distance. I couldn&#039;t stand the text-filled pages (mostly blather, too). I wanted a human being to pop out of my browser, hold my hand, and say, there, there, we&#039;ll take good care of your mum. Of course, that didn&#039;t happen on the Web. However, it did shine through on the phone calls I made.

This all proves my point - that we should have a Masters or PhD in psychology and ethnography and anthropology - in addition to language and writing degrees -  to do any proper communication work. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting! When I&#8217;ve worked at conferences as a volunteer, I&#8217;ve noticed how attendees will ask a person for information &#8211; while both are standing right next to a sign containing that info (like location of sessions or lunch)! That lesson sits at the back of my mind as a reminder of the importance of the real-life aspect of our work.</p>
<p>When I researched nursing homes for my late mother, I did so long distance. I couldn&#8217;t stand the text-filled pages (mostly blather, too). I wanted a human being to pop out of my browser, hold my hand, and say, there, there, we&#8217;ll take good care of your mum. Of course, that didn&#8217;t happen on the Web. However, it did shine through on the phone calls I made.</p>
<p>This all proves my point &#8211; that we should have a Masters or PhD in psychology and ethnography and anthropology &#8211; in addition to language and writing degrees &#8211;  to do any proper communication work. <img src='http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me, in a magazine, talking about porn – infoporn that is! by Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/me-in-a-magazine-talking-about-porn-infoporn-that-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=711#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Guy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;re right about the fact that some people look at the infographics more than the articles - I&#039;m one of them, but purely from a professional point of view of course.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think their prevalence is partly down to a reduction in people&#039;s attention span, and using them to catch people&#039;s attention. Used correctly though, they&#039;re ideal for telling a story that would otherwise be very long and turgid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Guy.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right about the fact that some people look at the infographics more than the articles &#8211; I&#8217;m one of them, but purely from a professional point of view of course.</p>
<p>I think their prevalence is partly down to a reduction in people&#8217;s attention span, and using them to catch people&#8217;s attention. Used correctly though, they&#8217;re ideal for telling a story that would otherwise be very long and turgid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me, in a magazine, talking about porn – infoporn that is! by Guy Cookson</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/me-in-a-magazine-talking-about-porn-infoporn-that-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Cookson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=711#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Good post. I think it&#039;s probably a bit of a fad, though I do know some people love these things more than the articles. I suppose it depends on how you like to get information - map vs. directions. Maybe it&#039;s something to do with being an arts or science type of person? Mostly though I think the designers should always say to themselves before they start: just because we can doesn&#039;t mean we should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I think it&#8217;s probably a bit of a fad, though I do know some people love these things more than the articles. I suppose it depends on how you like to get information &#8211; map vs. directions. Maybe it&#8217;s something to do with being an arts or science type of person? Mostly though I think the designers should always say to themselves before they start: just because we can doesn&#8217;t mean we should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on bmi baby baggage allowance text by brian</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/bmi-baby-baggage-allowance-text/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=430#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>Why is it that after paying £17.99 for  golf clubs carriage BMI Baby then charge an additional £14 handling charge ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that after paying £17.99 for  golf clubs carriage BMI Baby then charge an additional £14 handling charge ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on bmi baby baggage allowance text by Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/bmi-baby-baggage-allowance-text/comment-page-1/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=430#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>Hi Barry

Thanks for the question. I don&#039;t know the situation around hand luggage, but regarding luggage per person then yes, it is my understanding that each passenger is entitled to up to 18kg of luggage, the weight of which can be spread across up to 5 items of luggage. Of course you can take more, but it&#039;ll cost you!

I should add the disclaimer that this is my understanding of what bmibaby said. Also, this information is a good few months old now so the policy may have changed since, so it&#039;s probably best to check with them to avoid any nasty surprises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barry</p>
<p>Thanks for the question. I don&#8217;t know the situation around hand luggage, but regarding luggage per person then yes, it is my understanding that each passenger is entitled to up to 18kg of luggage, the weight of which can be spread across up to 5 items of luggage. Of course you can take more, but it&#8217;ll cost you!</p>
<p>I should add the disclaimer that this is my understanding of what bmibaby said. Also, this information is a good few months old now so the policy may have changed since, so it&#8217;s probably best to check with them to avoid any nasty surprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on bmi baby baggage allowance text by Barry Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/bmi-baby-baggage-allowance-text/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=430#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert, so am I clear in thinking that if I nhave booked three passengers online with BMI Baby, I can take 3 x 18kg in two cases, plus, 10 kg hand luggage?

Thank you Barry Cary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert, so am I clear in thinking that if I nhave booked three passengers online with BMI Baby, I can take 3 x 18kg in two cases, plus, 10 kg hand luggage?</p>
<p>Thank you Barry Cary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A heavenly piece of information design by Christopher Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/a-heavenly-piece-of-information-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roberthempsall.co.uk/?p=568#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Will do. Ha look at my first comment. There&#039;s me complaining about legibility and I&#039;ve put no effort in with paragraph spaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will do. Ha look at my first comment. There&#8217;s me complaining about legibility and I&#8217;ve put no effort in with paragraph spaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
